Weekly Column by Sharon Byrne
On crime, it’s the little things that lead to a safer city.
Police brass are fond of reporting that Part I crimes are down, and therefore it’s morning in Santa Barbara. Citizens are safe.
So… why doesn’t it feel that way? Why do people report avoiding downtown? Why do they hesitate in parking lots when panhandlers are present outside the store?
Part I is a classification of the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program by the FBI, and consists of the most violent crimes: murder, aggravated assault, forcible rape, and robbery. Part I property crimes consist of arson, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft.
When public safety becomes an issue, police understandably focus on Part I crimes. These crimes distress the community, and lead to a climate of fear that no one wants to live in. It’s also a fallback position: in the face of scarce resources, you pull back and focus on the immediate, most pressing threats. Thus the focus on Part I crime, and using it as a barometer of public safety. Get violent crime down, and the city is automatically safer.
It’s intuitive thinking, but the reality is that focusing on Part I crime does not lead to a safer city overall. Citizens who experience lower-level crimes like shoplifting, public drunkenness, vandalism, and beak-ins, don’t feel safe. They feel violated. They want something done. It’s great that murder is down, but if your neighborhood is the target of repeat break-ins, you don’t exactly feel safe.
If you’re a tired beat cop, you might be tempted to conclude that you can never rest in the gratitude of the public you serve, even momentarily. They’ll always find something to complain about.
But the public is right, in a totally counter-intuitive way.
Continue Reading →